Comments on: Threatens officials with ‘holy justice’

By: rainbow66

rainbow66 — Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:31:55 +0000

bunnym, I believe their day will come too. Karma is a bitch. Those two so called officers killed an innocent man that night and it is one night that I will never forget.

By: rainbow66

rainbow66 — Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:29:06 +0000

drsuess, you say you were there that night and saw everything. So why didnt you testify? I was there too and an innocent man was killed that night. I know I gave a statement and testified…why didnt you?

By: lucyinthesky53

lucyinthesky53 — Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:14:54 +0000

William was doing nothing more than taking a walk in the evening. NOTHING! We were not allowed to say in court that he had committed no crime. He was a gentle, harmless person reviled by the defense because his little cabin wasn’t as neat as defendents thought it sould be. They spent a lot of time trying to make the jury believe William deserved to be gunned down and left to bleed to death while officers staged the scene because he was not as clean as people in Clare should be. I doubt another trial in front of Judge Ludington will result in justice for William. Ludington directed the verdict last time and he will direct the verdict again. Remember these officers thought a cane was a rifle and a broom was a rifle and they are not afraid of the law or perjury. The City of Clare will do whatever it takes to justify taking William’s life and leaving him to bleed to death while the help he desperately needed was held off by these sterling examples of law enforcement officers. Sad to see what passes for justice in Michigan.

By: Sal

Sal — Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:18:38 +0000

Dr Suess as you are so familiar with the case please give me some insight into this. Both Officers gave a written statement to the police saying McGraw was on the ground when my brother advanced, McGraw was scooting backward while on the ground when he fired all his rounds. During 2 sword depositions both officers gave the same version, McGraw was on the ground firing. At trial they both swore under oath that McGraw was standing up because they knew the indisputable ballistics evidence made this clear. This means that they either lied under oath, a criminal offense (perjury) or the gave a false statement to the police also a criminal offense. So we have established they are criminals as both statements cannot be true. Why are they still wearing a uniform and have not been punished for either offense?

By: bigd

bigd — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 10:46:59 +0000

drsuess is back. Last I recall you were no longer going to visit word press? Your opinion has not changed I see, “psychobabble” not bad, although not real impressive for someone on your pedestal. You don’t like it when someone writes about the 2007 shooting. I will say, not many share your opinion, however, the court did rule. Those that were involved know, maybe you know, I don’t believe what you write, just my opinion . It is fun to read your post, the attitude is easy to pick. The scozzari family should push forward dispite any opinion. So hang in there, go have a doughnut and relax.

By: bunnym

bunnym — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 00:24:08 +0000

Richard, thank you, for your letter. Those two know what they did and their day will come. I’m a believer, Amen.

drsuess, I can clearly see your need for an English translation tool, because throughout all of these painful years, you’ve been writing gibberish.

By: drsuess

drsuess — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:03:14 +0000

Mike, can you offer a psychobabble to English translation tool on the site please? Thanks.