Congress is too old!

January 11, 2018

I have often been an advocate of term limitations in Congress. Having worked on the Hill and having a firsthand view of how our legislative branch works, I

Mike Wilcox Editor/Publisher

Mike Wilcox

believe our leaders get far too comfortable in their positions which lead to a lot of verbosity, and very little actual work getting done.

Thus I was pleased when Rep John Conyers stepped down a few weeks ago. The Michigan octogenarian who was the longest serving legislator on Capitol Hill- he was first elected in 1965, was far too old and out of touch with today’s world to be effective.

I could say the same for another Michigan congressman who handed his seat over to his wife a couple of years ago- that being John Dingell, the longest serving lawmaker in the history of our Republic, having first being elected in 1955.

Can you imagine having the same representative for 60 years? Most of us weren’t even born when Dingell was elected. Even more illogical- at least to me- is now Debbie Dingell, his wife, is now the new, old representative.

I don’t think our forefathers had any intention of our lawmakers making a career out of brokering power in Washington D.C. Yet time and again, many of our representatives, particularly the actual reps that hold leadership positions, have been in D.C. for decades.

Utah’s venerable Sen. Orrin Hatch announced last week that he is stepping down. Finally I say. Sen Hatch has been in his seat on the Senate floor for 42 years. Alabama’s senior senator, Richard Shelby needs to follow suit in my opinion. He has been running the D.C. gamut for 39 years. Enough is enough, Richard.
But the list goes on and on. McConnell, Pelosi, Schumer have all been hanging around for well over three decades. Dozens more, who might not wield the power of the aforementioned trio, have served at least 30 years.

The old saying “it gets better with age,” applies to fine wine, but it does not apply to politicians, fine or not. I think when you become comfortable in D.C. you are susceptible to the persuasive ways of lobbyists and become entrenched in the status quo.

You also dare not veer from the party line. You become powerful in D.C. by sucking up to your leaders and fighting hard to win support for their pet projects. Those who dare to challenge those leaders usually end up with no power, or even worse, defeated at the polls.

Those very little opportunity for a 30-something to gain power or leadership reigns in D.C. You have to pay your dues and maybe, just maybe, after you’ve been around for 30 years, you might be given a key committee chairmanship. That’s the way it works, and if you ask me, it’s not what most Americans expect.

The only way we, as constituents will be able to see people like Shelby or Debbie Dingell leave office is if they retire on their own accord, or term limitations are put in place, and they will be forced out.

So if you want real change in Washington, think about term limitations. Most of us would prefer young, vibrant go-getters as our representatives versus octogenarians who prefer sitting around collecting their generous salaries and benefits.

Share This Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Current day month ye@r *