Threatens officials with ‘holy justice’

January 25, 2013

Dear Editor,

To all readers particularly Bunny M., and Rainbow 66. Whom know the facts the real truth. I am with you good people of the, with the truth, without cease. For holy justice.
Ever reminiscent of the ever evil, murderers. Dwayne Meidzianowski is that supposed to be an honorable gentleman’s name? No, never! And Jeremy McGraw? Oh quick draw McGraw? An honorable gentleman’s name? No, never! And why? Because they are murderers of an innocent gentlemen, Mr. William Scozzari in 2007. And that ever include in evil collusion Michelle J. Ambrozaitis. Attempted murder of Mr. Jerami N. Young, by way of Clare County Sheriff Deputy Kashin. And Sheriff John Wilson oh dah! Nobody ever told me nothing liar! He knows the coward!

Has anyone else noticed? Other than me? How those ever unforgivable murderous lying cowards are all holed up under one roof? In ever evil collusion together? In the Clare County Sheriff Department building? I have and I am sure, I am not the only one who has noticed the fact!

Holy justice and punishment is definitely coming for those cowardly, lying, murderous criminals, by way of judges, whom know the facts, Amen.

Helping bring thunder and lightning down of holy justice upon those ever unforgivable criminals, elitists of ever self cursing, damning self pride. Is ever my humbling pleasure, ever without fear, ever without pride of any person, place or thing, thought, word or deed. Amen.

Ever, a Holy Saint son, Priest prophet Apostle. Ever indwelled of ever the ever, precious Holy, Heavenly Father. Holy Christ Jesus, the Holy Spirit an ever dear gentleman whom are ever one, ever spirit, soul and physical natural body. As well as an ever second return to his Earth. Amen

Richard L. Bancroft

Share This Post

Error, no group ID set! Check your syntax!

7 Responses to Threatens officials with ‘holy justice’

  1. drsuess

    January 25, 2013 at 4:03 pm

    Mike, can you offer a psychobabble to English translation tool on the site please? Thanks.

    • rainbow66

      January 30, 2013 at 2:29 pm

      drsuess, you say you were there that night and saw everything. So why didnt you testify? I was there too and an innocent man was killed that night. I know I gave a statement and testified…why didnt you?

  2. bunnym

    January 26, 2013 at 12:24 am

    Richard, thank you, for your letter. Those two know what they did and their day will come. I’m a believer, Amen.

    drsuess, I can clearly see your need for an English translation tool, because throughout all of these painful years, you’ve been writing gibberish.

    • rainbow66

      January 30, 2013 at 2:31 pm

      bunnym, I believe their day will come too. Karma is a bitch. Those two so called officers killed an innocent man that night and it is one night that I will never forget.

  3. bigd

    January 27, 2013 at 10:46 am

    drsuess is back. Last I recall you were no longer going to visit word press? Your opinion has not changed I see, “psychobabble” not bad, although not real impressive for someone on your pedestal. You don’t like it when someone writes about the 2007 shooting. I will say, not many share your opinion, however, the court did rule. Those that were involved know, maybe you know, I don’t believe what you write, just my opinion . It is fun to read your post, the attitude is easy to pick. The scozzari family should push forward dispite any opinion. So hang in there, go have a doughnut and relax.

  4. Sal

    January 28, 2013 at 1:18 pm

    Dr Suess as you are so familiar with the case please give me some insight into this. Both Officers gave a written statement to the police saying McGraw was on the ground when my brother advanced, McGraw was scooting backward while on the ground when he fired all his rounds. During 2 sword depositions both officers gave the same version, McGraw was on the ground firing. At trial they both swore under oath that McGraw was standing up because they knew the indisputable ballistics evidence made this clear. This means that they either lied under oath, a criminal offense (perjury) or the gave a false statement to the police also a criminal offense. So we have established they are criminals as both statements cannot be true. Why are they still wearing a uniform and have not been punished for either offense?

  5. lucyinthesky53

    January 28, 2013 at 3:14 pm

    William was doing nothing more than taking a walk in the evening. NOTHING! We were not allowed to say in court that he had committed no crime. He was a gentle, harmless person reviled by the defense because his little cabin wasn’t as neat as defendents thought it sould be. They spent a lot of time trying to make the jury believe William deserved to be gunned down and left to bleed to death while officers staged the scene because he was not as clean as people in Clare should be. I doubt another trial in front of Judge Ludington will result in justice for William. Ludington directed the verdict last time and he will direct the verdict again. Remember these officers thought a cane was a rifle and a broom was a rifle and they are not afraid of the law or perjury. The City of Clare will do whatever it takes to justify taking William’s life and leaving him to bleed to death while the help he desperately needed was held off by these sterling examples of law enforcement officers. Sad to see what passes for justice in Michigan.